Showing posts with label Kirsten Powers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kirsten Powers. Show all posts

"Penis Gagging, BDSM, and Rape Fantasy: The Truth About Kinky Sexting"

Check out my latest SexIs Magazine column, "Penis Gagging, BDSM, and Rape Fantasy: The Truth About Kinky Sexting" - I didn't hold back!



“You don’t want to gag a woman with your penis unless you have some serious issues with the way you see women.” So says Kirsten Powers, ex-girlfriend of sex-scandal star Congressman Anthony Weiner, in a piece for The Daily Beast. She is referencing his sexting relationship with a Las Vegas blackjack dealer. The transcript of their texts was posted by Radar Online, including one bit that prompted Powers’ musing: “You will gag on me before you c** with me in you” and “[I’m] thinking about gagging your hot mouth with my c***.”

This column is not about Weiner. I’m pretty over political sex scandals and am inclined to think that someone like Weiner wanted to get caught, consciously or unconsciously. The only positive thing I can say about such scandals is that they do help shed light on just how unenlightened we are about topics like monogamy and BDSM. Here we have an example of a woman making a blanket statement about something she clearly doesn’t know the first thing about, simply because it offends her.

You know the phrase, “Taken out of context, I must seem so strange?” That goes double for pulling random bits of erotic conversation, texted or otherwise, and analyzing them as if they told a whole story. Without the motivation of the person sending and receiving them, you really don’t know anything, and yet it seems that a default anti-BDSM reaction is acceptable. Our public squeamishness over the fact that some people can eroticize pain, degradation, and being ordered around, safely, consensually and pleasurably, is nothing more than a prejudice that needs to be eradicated.

Read the whole column, and if you like it, please spread the word - social media buttons at the top, or whatever your preferred method. Thank you!

Let's condemn BDSM and dominance and porn along with Weiner because it's so fucking easy to judge people, shall we?

I haven't been paying as close attention to the Anthony Weiner scandal as I could because that would involve reading way more than I have time for. So this is not really about Weiner but more about BDSM and giant blanket statements about sexuality, specifically dominant male sexuality. Which it's not my place to defend per se, so maybe some smart dominant guy out there will write the proper rebuttal to this giant generalization by Weiner's ex, Kirsten Powers, at The Daily Beast. I'm no longer shocked when a very specific piece about sexuality veers into the giant blanket condemnation but I do want to publicly state that the more we allow anyone to get away with statements like this, the more we demonize sexuality as a whole. Just because you don't understand something or don't like it or don't want to do it or don't agree with it doesn't make it wrong for everyone. And again, I'm not defending Weiner, I don't actually think political sex scandals are or should be that shocking anymore, but they do help illuminate broader thoughts on sexuality. Bolding mine:

This is not about sex. It’s about dominating and inflicting physical pain on a woman, a fantasy the hard-corn porn industry makes billions of dollars on selling to men. You don’t want to gag a woman with your penis unless you have some serious issues with the way you see women.

Again, I haven't even looked at those transcripts but I don't need to to oppose a blanket statement like this. It's also the simplistic type of thinking about sex that is ubiquitous, even in 2011, even in an age of supposed sexual freedom and tolerance. That exists for the "right" kinds of sex, and apparently, kinky sex doesn't count according to the powers (ha ha ha) that be.

My only other thought thus far I left as a comment at Daily Intel regarding his wife, Huma Abedin:

Maybe political wives, on some level, are ready (or should be ready) for anything, scandal included, and have already thought about what might happen in light of all the other scandals that have popped up in recent years. It seems likely that she would've at least considered "What would I do?" and maybe this is what she decided a long time ago (I have no idea, just speculating).

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...